- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 03:24:06 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 9/30/15 7:08 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > I vote +1 for the proposal in > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2015Sep/0162.html > and any proposal in accordance with "I believe if something is left > unspecified then it should count as > unconstrained." in that message. What is the / is there a / interaction between unconstrained and the use of closed shapes? I'm thinking of properties with no declared constraints, and whether there is a different result with open or closed shapes. Conceptually there is a big difference in my mind - with an open shape, the property with no declared constraints is no different from a property that is not included in the shape definition; with a closed shape, the property with no declared constraints is an optional property, and does not trigger a validation error. kc -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 10:24:36 UTC