Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today

On 6/26/2015 5:06 AM, Andrea Perego wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:06 AM,  <Simon.Cox@csiro.au> wrote:
>>> Then, the requirement is:
>> 1.
>>> to be able to reference a CRS with a URI, and
>> 2.
>>> to get useful information about the CRS when you dereference that URI.
>> Then there are at least two more requirements:
>> 3. a mechanism to associate a CRS reference with a geometry description
>> 4. for there to be a default or implied CRS reference where it is not explicit in the data.
> +1
>
> Andrea
>
+1 from me too.

Matt

Received on Friday, 26 June 2015 12:34:49 UTC