- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:20:22 -0800
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- CC: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
As far as I can tell, this doesn't connect an RDF graph to a shape at all. Therefore it would only be a support mechanism for the no-linking mechanism, https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Graph_Shape_Association#No_Linking, requiring that constraint validation has a separate argument that provides a pointer to the shapes to be provided. peter On 12/04/2014 03:16 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > * Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> [2014-12-04 15:01-0800] >> I'm claiming victory on this action, based on >> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Graph_Shape_Association > > Resource Shapes commonly uses rs:resourceShape to link an HTTP > interface with the shape describing data that one may POST there. > http://www.w3.org/Submission/2014/SUBM-shapes-20140211/#resourceShape > > Which kind of linking would that be? > > >> peter >> >> On 12/04/2014 11:58 AM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> shapes-ACTION-4: Create new wiki page for issue-3, seeded with his email message >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/actions/4 >>> >>> Assigned to: Peter Patel-Schneider >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2014 23:20:52 UTC