- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:07:24 +1000
- To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Forgive my ignorance (I am new to W3C processes), but could someone explain how such recorded Issues are being usually discussed? I went ahead and added a "Related note" to this ticket here, and expected an email update to be copied to the mailing list, but this apparently hasn't happened. So are we supposed to respond on the email list directly? Thanks Holger On 11/19/2014 3:15, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-2 (Audience skills): What skills is expected/required from our audience? > > http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/2 > > Raised by: Arnaud Le Hors > On product: > > We've started discussing who the audience for Shapes is but what have not discussed what skills the audience is expected to have. > We can assume general understanding of the basic RDF data model but what about RDFS, SPARQL, and OWL? Can we expect users of Shapes to be expert in these? Anything else? > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2014 23:10:07 UTC