Re: forms, direction, query, etc …

>> Henry opened up some discussion at the end of our phone conference today, regarding his proposal about forms and query. 
>> 
>> I've got to say that I thought Henry's proposal [1] was really
>> elegant.
> 
> +1
> 
>> I also think that it is a solution for a problem that is very relevant to LDP. 
>> 
>> If it has a flaw, it that a client needs to be SPARQL aware - which I don't think will help uptake. I made my proposal on this topic at [2]. I'll freely admit that it does not have the elegance of Henry's use of SPARQL to drive interaction from the client, but, what it does have is simplicity! It is sort of like "duck-typed creation" .... it doesn't offer anything elaborate (repeated, options, etc.) at the moment. 
>> 
> 
> Thanks for the reminder for this subthread which was raised initially in
> the discussion about Issue-33... but... what exactly is the point that
> Henry was after during today's meeting ?
> 
> I'm not sure it is strictly related to issue 33 but maybe more to other
> issues about discovery of the expected POST content, etc.
> 
> Would you mind clarifying, and maybe propose a particular open issue we
> should tackle during the next meeting where Henry's proposal would help
> (providing that we got rid of the "opening raised issues phase" before
> ;) ?

hi Olivier, 

I am happy to have a go and summarise the state of this topic. 
This could be a starting point for discussions at the next meeting. 

Roger