- From: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>
- Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 14:50:42 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
On 04/10/2013 14:43, David Wainberg wrote: >> As always, the devil is in the details. Could you elaborate a bit >> further on this in order to allow us to imagine what you are proposing? > So, we agree that customization based on cross-site activity would be > allowable under DNT under some conditions. The conditions I propose are > limits on retention of users' browsing history (including for permitted > uses) and robust transparency for data collection and use. The condition I would prefer is of no cross-site application or gathering of personal (identifiable) data. See my other message of examples of such cross-site customisation that would be, in my opinion, acceptable despite a DNT:1 signal. So zero user browsing history retention beyond the permitted uses. Robust transparency is something I am rarely opposed to and would still be advisable in such a scenario, if only not to undermine the credibility of the standard and for the sake of user trust loss prevention. Regards, Walter
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 12:51:10 UTC