- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 11:55:16 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Le 03/07/2013 06:57, fantasai a écrit :
> Parens and Escapes
> ------------------
>
> - RESOLVED: MQ requires white-space on both sides of a parenthesis
I believe that this is an incorrect summary of the change we discussed.
The change is rather to require whitespace on both sides of the 'and'
keyword (and 'or', when and if we add it) when that would separate form
the "outside" of a parenthesis. That is:
) and
and (
Note that 'and(', being a FUNCTION token, was already invalid. But using
S+ rather than S* in the grammar avoids incorrectly suggesting that it
is valid. This change only affects 'and/**/(', as well as ')and' for
symmetry.
This is the same change that was resolved on 2012-12-19 for @supports:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0330.html
--
Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 10:55:29 UTC