- From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 18:48:30 +0200
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 23-05-13 18:40, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > It would be nice to have a pointer to the actual thing that is being > decided, which I take to be the resolution of the feature at risk at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-turtle-20130219/#grammar-production-sparqlPrefix Good point, I was too hasty :(. Will add this. Guus > > > This is ISSUE-89 http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/89 > > peter > > PS: That said, I have no preference. :-) > > > > On 05/23/2013 08:03 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote: >> All, >> >> We didn't have time at the last telecon to get to this during >> yesterday's telecon. I would be very grateful if you could participate >> in an e-vote on this issue via the WBS poll at: >> >> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/46168/at-sign/ >> >> The poll is open until next Tuesday, end of the (Boston) day. >> >> Thanks, >> Guus >> >
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2013 16:48:58 UTC