- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:35:50 +0000
- To: Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>
- CC: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
On 07/03/13 17:34, Dave Reynolds wrote: > Thanks Benedit. /Benedikt/ sorry for the typo. Dave > > On: > >> ISSUE-32 Relationship to ISO19156 - Observations & Measurements? >>> Agree with putting the WG's result about this issue in the QB UC >>> document. Can someone tell me how we should proceed here? > > The action remains with me to draft an initial version of this section > for you to include at an appropriate point in the UC Note. I won't be > able to do this for a little while but since the Note doesn't have to go > through a Last Call process then we have a lot more time to deal with it. > > Dave > > > On 07/03/13 17:19, Benedikt Kaempgen wrote: >> Thanks for this overview, Dave, >> >> Here my comments to the issues (the comments to the spec come with >> another mail): >> >>> ISSUE-29 Well-formedness >> Have not tried the queries but had a look over their meaning and have >> not found any errors. >> >>> ISSUE-30 Declaring relations between cubes (bad summary) >> Postpone is fine for me. >> >>> ISSUE-31 Supporting aggregation for other than SKOS hierarchies >> Although I have not tried this modelling myself, I do not find logical >> errors and thus agree. >> >> However, I will have a comment to the hierarchical code list section >> in the spec. >> >>> ISSUE-32 Relationship to ISO19156 - Observations & Measurements? >> Agree with putting the WG's result about this issue in the QB UC >> document. Can someone tell me how we should proceed here? >> >>> ISSUE-34 Clarify or drop qb:subslice ? >> Would have preferred to keep it, but ok, agree. >> >>> ISSUE-33 Collections of observations and well-formedness of slices >> I am not fully convinced that qb:ObservationGroup fully fulfills the >> need of publishing a latest-value-slice but I think it is a useful >> extension. Agree. >> >>> ISSUE-39 Allow skos:Collections as value of qb:codeList >> Agree. >> >> Best, >> >> Benedikt >> >> ________________________________________ >> Von: Dave Reynolds [dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com] >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. März 2013 16:03 >> An: Government Linked Data Working Group >> Betreff: [QB] Disposition of issues >> >> I'd like us to clean up the ISSUEs and ACTIONs list for Data Cube. >> >> Here's a summary of where I believe we are on each of these. >> >> ISSUE-29 Well-formedness >> >> Discussed on list thread [1]. I believe we have a good set of criteria >> and SPARQL queries to implement them. This is reflected in section 13 of >> the current draft [2]. Recommend move to PENDING_REVIEW >> >> ISSUE-30 Declaring relations between cubes (bad summary) >> >> Discussed on list thread [3]. No disagreement with postponing. Note >> added to spec about possibility of future extensions to support this >> (section 10.4 [4]). Recommend moving to POSTPONED. >> >> ISSUE-31 Supporting aggregation for other than SKOS hierarchies >> >> Discussed on list thread [5] and [10]. Compromise reached with the >> introduction of qb:HierarchicalCodeList, qb:hierarchyRoot and >> qb:parentChildProperty. Described in revised section 10.3 [6]. Recommend >> moving this to PENDING_REVIEW and then to CLOSED once Richard and >> Benedikt are happy with it. >> >> ISSUE-32 Relationship to ISO19156 - Observations & Measurements? >> >> Proposal to write information note on this as part of the Data Cube >> requirements document. Should remain OPEN. >> >> ISSUE-33 Collections of observations and well-formedness of slices >> >> Discussed on list starting with thread [7]. Solution reached with >> introduction of qb:ObservationGroup and qb:observationGroup. Described >> at end of section 9 of the spec [8]. Recommend CLOSE. >> >> ISSUE-34 Clarify or drop qb:subslice ? >> >> Discussed on list starting thread [9]. While Benedikt has a reasonable >> use case, Richard and I felt that given the limited time available to >> resolve the problems it was better to remove this. It can always be >> reintroduced in a future extension. Removal done. Recommend CLOSE. >> >> ISSUE-37 Align Data Cube with SDMX 2.1 >> >> This remains OPEN for now. If Richard is able to deal with it in the >> time available then that would be wonderful. Otherwise move to POSTPONED. >> >> ISSUE-39 Allow skos:Collections as value of qb:codeList >> >> Discussed on thread [10]. Handled by generalizing range of qb:codeList. >> Recommend CLOSE. >> >> ACTION-30 pending review Produce editor's draft of Data Cube spec >> Richard Cyganiak 2012-02-01 Data Cube Vocabulary >> >> Obsolete, recommend CLOSE. >> >> ACTION-42 pending review Update >> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Data_Cube_Vocabulary Richard Cyganiak >> 2012-02-02 Data Cube Vocabulary >> >> Obsolete, recommend CLOSE. >> >> ACTION-56 open Address QB feedback from Curran Richard Cyganiak >> 2012-03-04 Data Cube Vocabulary >> >> This feedback was all dealt with some time ago. Recommend CLOSE. >> >> ACTION-63 open Improve SDMX references Dave Reynolds >> 2012-04-27 Data >> Cube Vocabulary >> >> Done, request CLOSE. >> >> ACTION-64 open Provide informative references to COG RDF schemes >> >> Done, request CLOSE. >> >> Dave >> >> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0106.html >> >> [2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html#wf >> >> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0085.html >> >> [4] >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html#schemes-aggregation >> >> >> [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0097.html >> >> [6] >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html#schemes-hierarchy-nonskos >> >> >> [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0087.html >> Some replies are not correctly linked to the thread in the mail archives. >> >> [8] >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html#slices >> >> [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0084.html >> Some replies are not correctly linked to the thread in the mail archives. >> >> [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Mar/0008.html >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2013 17:36:24 UTC