- From: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:09:05 +0100
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- CC: "Dr. David Filip" <David.Filip@ul.ie>, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>, public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
On 14/10/2012 10:15, Felix Sasaki wrote: > 3) No 2) would have been my input on Monday - from the ITS side, I > think it is helpful to have implementors on board. So far I can see > Yves / Okapi, and various people who might wrap Okaki (e.g. SOLAS). > Having more implementors who provide an additional basis library (=in > addition to OKAPI) might be helpful. > Guys, Returning to this thread. CMS-LION already supports mapping of content files to-from XLIFF, so we'll be happy to try and support the ITS-XLIFF mappings as they firm up. We'd aim to make this available as a public demonstrator, linked in with SOLAS to show additional business functionality. David demonstrated aspects of this in Seattle (with simplisitc interim mappings), and can run through it again in Lyon. Also, Leroy is able to generate XLIFF as output of the test suite, so again we will be able to support ITS-to-XLIFF conformance tests based on our existing input files once the mapping is firmed up. We won't put this on the critical path in the test suite development, to avoid any delay to the ITS-conformance testing. Again, we'd be happy to offer this test facility in parallel to the ITS test suite - CNGL can always host it independently if any 'jurisdictional' issues arise. Yves, David, we may need to consider however, whether this set of ITS input files is sufficient to test all the mappings. Plus we'd also want to consider a set of XLIFF-to-ITS tests at some later point. We could use the saem test suite infrastructure, but it would have to wait until after the ITS draft and test suite are done. cheers, Dave
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 10:04:59 UTC