- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:39:48 +0100
- To: public-gld-wg@w3.org
On 18/10/12 10:31, Dave Reynolds wrote: > On 18/10/12 09:51, Government Linked Data Working Group Issue Tracker > wrote: >> ISSUE-38 (Registered what?): Name of the vocab formerly known as Core >> Business Vocabulary, currently called Legal Entity [Organization >> Ontology] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/38 >> >> Raised by: Phil Archer >> On product: Organization Ontology >> >> The WG recently resolved to change the name of the 'Core Business >> Vocabulary' as the term was considered too broad and misleading. No >> objections anywhere. >> >> However, it turns out that the choice of what to rename it to was >> unfortunate. I'd like to resolve this as part of the ORG to LC debate >> to clarify the relationship with it (although this does not in any way >> affect ORG itself). > > Seems entirely reasonable to me (IANAC - I am not a chair) to discuss > this as a neighbouring agenda item but don't make it part of moving org > to LC. ARGH! I now see that you've raised this as an issue on ORG. Did you mean to do that? Surely this is an issue for the ontology formerly known as the Legal Entity vocabulary. Dave
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 13:40:20 UTC