Re: new version of 'objectives matrix'

http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/09/action-726
All the best, Ashok

On 9/18/2012 3:17 PM, David Booth wrote:
> Link please?
>
> On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 17:31 -0400, Jonathan A Rees wrote:
>> re ACTION-726 and TAG effectiveness:
>>
>> As requested I added links to findings and issues. That means I've
>> done everything I originally intended to do on this activity.
>> I tried to include all findings and all open and pending review issues.
>> There are a few exceptions for things I (subjectively) considered
>> trivial or redundant.
>> A few closed issues are in there too, but I found that for the most
>> part these were either unimportant or redundant with findings.
>>
>> Some 'objectives' are similar to one another and the placement of
>> findings and issues is sometimes somewhat arbitrary.
>>
>> The matrix is big. I split the 'approach' column into columns for
>> architectural or tactical approach (technology independent) vs.
>> 'realization' (how it plays out in practice). I also added a column
>> for finding and issue references. There are a few new rows for
>> architectural objectives not covered in AWWW (deep linking,
>> mechanization, scalability), and a list of 'orphan' issues whose
>> architectural objectives I was unable to articulate.
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>
>>

Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2012 22:30:13 UTC