Re: Using "Punning" to Answer httpRange-14

On 5/15/12 9:37 AM, Michiel de Jong wrote:
>> >  The point isn't about making anything obligatory. The point is about leaving
>> >  the AWWW as it is. It handles the problem well. The fact that people get it
>> >  wrong doesn't mean you break the system.
> OK, I disagree with that, but at least i understand your standpoint
> now. Thanks for taking the extra effort of explaining it in some more
> detail!

How can you disagree with a route to the destination you seek? Please 
explain to me the point of disagreement if you don't concur with the 
comments that follow:

You are seeking unobtrusive introduction of new Web realms (systems or 
dimensions) that don't force the hands of Web users. There is nothing 
about the 303 heuristic that forces the hands of existing Web users that 
are minting identifiers for Web Resources ever day.

A problem arises when we conflate the roles and overall profiles of:

1. Web User
2. Web Client Application Developer
3. Web Server Application Developer.

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 13:56:51 UTC