Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]

My immediate reaction to this is "ummm... no?"  We can't reverse this 
order.  It would mean that if there is EVER an @vocab then terms don't 
work.  Why would we want terms to not work?  Or am I missing something?

On 2/13/2012 2:24 AM, RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker 
wrote:
> ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/129
>
> Raised by: Niklas Lindström
> On product: 3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core
>
> The essence of the proposal change the rules in 7.4.3 to:
>
> [[[
> * If there is a local default vocabulary, the IRI is obtained by
> concatenating that value and the term.
> * Otherwise, check if the term matches an item in the list of local
> term mappings. First compare against the list case-sensitively, and if
> there is no match then compare case-insensitively. If there is a
> match, use the associated IRI.
> * Otherwise, the term has no associated IRI and must be ignored.
> ]]]
>
> See related mails
>
>

-- 
Shane McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
+1 763 786 8160 x120

Received on Monday, 13 February 2012 15:42:46 UTC