- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:42:59 +0000
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- CC: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Paul, I've drawn up an outline plan for progressing PROV-AQ to FPWD. Do you think anything is missing here, or not required? ... Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD 1. Change document tag and name from PAQ to PROV-AQ 2. Review issues and comments; apply simple non-controversial editorial suggestions 3. Close resolved issues 4. Review call-out boxes (issues and pending) and remove those that don't refer to live issues 5. Update author list 6. Update acknowledgements 7. Add status of this document text (Where can I find a template/example for this? W3C pubrules pages aren't helping me) 8. Prepare HTML document that meets W3C pubrules [1] 9. Submit for W3C FPWD publication [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules ... I note that we've received received quite a bit of useful feedback for clarification over the past week or so, and I think it would be useful to incorporate the simple editorial comments as they will hopefully help readers to understand better what we're trying to do. I should be able to do items 1-6 within the next week. #g --
Received on Friday, 25 November 2011 10:11:45 UTC