- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:58:23 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 29/09/11 15:01, Sandro Hawke wrote: > For ACTION-536 I asked W3C's security lead, Thomas Roessler, which hash > algorithms we should use and he agreed with: > XML Signature Syntax and Processing Version 2.0 > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core2/#sec-MessageDigests > > which, in the current WD says SHA-1 (for backward compatibility), > SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512. > > Including all four is one or two more than the commenter wants, but > seems warranted in this case, I think. > > -- Sandro Sandro : thanks for asking Thomas. I like the idea of adopting this set because there is a reason (and they have URIs). Andy
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2011 14:59:04 UTC