- From: Jean-Claude Dufourd <jean-claude.dufourd@telecom-paristech.fr>
- Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:23:16 +0200
- To: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- CC: Russell Berkoff <r.berkoff@sisa.samsung.com>, Matt Hammond <matt.hammond@rd.bbc.co.uk>, public-web-and-tv@w3.org
On 7/6/11 14:05 , Giuseppe Pascale wrote: > I would propose though some changes to make it follow a little bit > more the approved template [1]: > - incorporate the "implementation" section in the description > - remove any reference to UPnP from the implementation section (since > we will probably have a separate contribution on this topic) > - add the need/justification section from the template, in particular > try to answer the questions: > * Why were you not able to use only existing standards to accomplish > this? > * What might you suggest could be standardized? JCD: I tried to do that just now. Best regards JC -- JC Dufourd Directeur d'Etudes/Professor Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group Traitement du Signal et Images/Signal and Image Processing Telecom ParisTech, 37-39 rue Dareau, 75014 Paris, France Tel: +33145817733 - Mob: +33677843843 - Fax: +33145817144
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 12:23:40 UTC