- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:34:57 -0400
- To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 4/27/11 4:16 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > On 27 April 2011 21:27, Manu Sporny<msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: >> We are submitting this video and demo of the pure JavaScript/Flash >> implementation of WebID to the W3C Identity Workshop along w/ our >> position paper. It also contains a fairly simple introduction to some of >> the problems that WebID solves. Our CTO tells me that we may be able to >> replace Flash with HTML5 WebSockets - providing a completely >> non-proprietary implementation of WebID in JavaScript. >> >> I thought the folks on here would be interested in the video: >> >> http://vimeo.com/22947088 > Very good. A great demo and explanation. > > The websocket version sounds pretty exciting, though using the flash > version in the interim seems to me to have quite a few advantages. Manu, I still think the storage abstraction has to be decoupled such that X.509 cert and associated private key are persisted (by user choice) to one of: 1. Native OS keystore 2. Browser store 3. PEM file 4. Database -- via ODBC connection to a DBMS using HTML5 WebDB API 5. etc.. Kingsley >> -- manu >> >> -- >> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) >> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >> blog: The PaySwarm Vocabulary >> http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/03/31/payswarm-vocab/ >> >> > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2011 20:35:37 UTC