- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:57:40 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
On 23.04.2010 00:04, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:20 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> On 22.04.2010 14:15, Lachlan Hunt wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> This is an alternate change proposal for ISSUE-107. >>>> ... >>> >>> Thanks Lachlan. >>> >>> Chairs: I think this is superior to my original proposal; should I retract >>> that? >> >> If no one prefers your original, then sure. >> >> At this point I'd ask: does anyone object to Lachlan's alternative? > > I would be happy to add the example Lachlan proposes. I object to removing > the example being discussed. There are a number of examples of<object> in > the spec, covering a variety of different ways of giving fallback: > ... It is a change proposal to *replace* the current example. Adding this as a new example will not address the problems that have been pointed out with the existing text. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 22:58:21 UTC