- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:24:12 +0200
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 21.04.2010 08:51, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > ... >> For the first one I may be opening a bug later on, the second one >> seems to be an oversight as the IDL attribute isn't there anymore. > > Filing a bug later on the first is fine, if you choose to do so. Will do. > On Apr 20, 2010, at 11:44 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> On 21.04.2010 08:33, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> Right, but DOM Level 2 HTML did include it. >> >> I do not disagree with the statement that's left, but now it really >> lacks context; it's a "Note:" without any text it refers to. Maybe one >> sentence needs to be added stating what you just said. > > If this isn't a blocker for ISSUE-82, perhaps that could be a separate > bug as well? I'm willing to file it, it does seem worth clarifying that > the note is there because attribute was in previous specs. As much as I'd like to close ISSUE-82, this is really a problem caused by the suggested change. We really should fix it. So *if* we have consensus that the spec doesn't define the IDL attribute we consequently should also drop comments about it (yes, I just changed my mind on that). Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2010 07:24:58 UTC