- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:08:36 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Julian Reschke wrote: > James Graham wrote: >> I haven't added any ISSUEs with a status of RAISED rather than OPEN >> yet. They will be added as soon as I get around to it. If anyone would >> like to suggest which section(s) the RAISED issues should be >> associated with that would be a considerable help. >> ... > > How about adding metadata to the issue page, so that information can be > discovered automatically. Such as: > > APPLIES-TO-HTML5-SECTION: hyperlink-auditing Something like that could work although it will be a bit fragile since it will rely on scraping magic strings. Probably no more so than the rest of the setup though. I have experimented with ISSUE-4 adding "HTML5-SPEC-SECTIONS the-doctype" at the end of the description field. The notes field seems more appropriate but appears to be immutable, which I had forgotten. I assume that one issue could be associated with more than one section so the field would have a space-separated list of markers. The change in magic marker string is entirely due to not checking what you originally wrote. Assuming there are no objections I will write some code that uses this approach this evening.
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2009 10:08:37 UTC