- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:03:53 -0400
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hi, SVG- I've gone into the source of the most recent HTML5 draft (off the WHATWG site) and uncommented all the SVG references. Some of them are pretty trivial, so they aren't worth working into our proposal. I've stripped the document down to a manageable size, removing parts that I was pretty sure we wouldn't need to edit. I left in most of the parsing section, just in case we need to change stuff in an unexpected place. For example, though the original draft doesn't say anything about SVG in the attribute-parsing section, that is where we would put a reference to SVG parsing errors (to be corrected and reported to the error console) for unquoted attribute values. I uploaded two documents, the stripped-down reference version [1], and the version I intend for us to edit directly [2]. I've uploaded HTML documents rather than put them into the wiki, because I think it will be easier to diff and easier to work with the raw markup for our proposed text. [1] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/proposals/svg-html/html5-frag.html [2] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/proposals/svg-html/html5-mod.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Friday, 13 March 2009 05:04:03 UTC