RE: SAWSDL Category [section 2.3 of Semantic Annotations for WSDL ]

Thanks Jacek for opening a new issue on the subject.

I understand that the spec is independent of any taxonomies, but it does not mean that a given taxonomie shouldn't always be referenced by its "normalized" URI.
For instance, if I want to publish the categorization information of a SAWSDL declaration into UDDI, I need to make a correspondence between the taxonomy tModels already available in my UDDI registry and the taxonomyURI attribute of the sawsdl:category element.

1. If there is a corresponding tModel (sawsdl:category = the value of an overviewURL of a given tModel;  http://www.uddi.org/taxonomies/UDDI_Taxonomy_tModels.htm#NAICS  for example) then I know I'll need to use the tModelKey of this tModel.

2. If there is no corresponding tModel, I'll need to publish a new one with the value of the sawsdl:category taxonomyURI attribute as its overviewURL value THEN go back to step 1.

If the NAICS taxonomy can be referenced by any uri, there is no way a publishing component can *automatically* publish a SAWSDL declaration using the categorization information...

Correct me if I'm wrong :-)

Pierre 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : public-ws-semann-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-semann-request@w3.org]De la part de Jacek Kopecky
Envoyé : lundi 12 juin 2006 16:47
A : Pierre Châtel
Cc : public-ws-semann@w3.org
Objet : Re: SAWSDL Category [section 2.3 of Semantic Annotations for WSDL]



Dear Pierre, 

the SAWSDL spec is independent of any taxonomies, but the ones you
mention could be pointed to as examples. I opened new issue 20 [1] to
consider that.

If you decide to use SAWSDL (or WSDL-S) in your work, you can already
use these taxonomies, most probably you'd put those tModel URIs as
taxonomyURI on interface category.

Hope it helps,

Jacek

On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 23:53 +0200, Pierre Châtel wrote:
> Hi List,
> 
> me again. Since I'm continuing my work on mapping sawsdl into UDDI, I  
> noticed that you did not specified any normalized URIs for  
> referencing NAICS, UNSPNC or GICS taxonomies.
> Wouldn't it be great to use the ones that are specified in http:// 
> uddi.org/taxonomies/UDDI_Taxonomy_tModels.htm ?
> Like http://www.uddi.org/taxonomies/UDDI_Taxonomy_tModels.htm#NAICS  
> for NAICS
> or http://www.uddi.org/taxonomies/UDDI_Taxonomy_tModels.htm#UNSPSC  
> for UNSPNC ?
> 
> This way i would be able to map the categorization information  
> provided by a SAWSDL service definition by directly using the  
> standard UDDI taxonomy tModels (just by matching URIs when mapping to  
> UDDI) !
> 
> Pierre
>

Received on Monday, 12 June 2006 15:45:55 UTC