- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:20:39 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > Lachlan Hunt wrote: >> I'm considering adjusting the spec to allow just two options, and >> making IE8's behaviour non-conforming. >> >> Either: >> 1. Match unvisited and visted links normally with :link and :visited, >> respecitively. >> 2. Match all links with :link, and no links with :visted (i.e. treat >> all links as unvisited) > > I think that you should just require that if the UA implements :link and > :visited at all any link must match one or the other. Which one is up > to the UA. That allows UAs to impose security policies as needed while > still allowing authors to match all links with ":link, :visited". This sounds like an excellent idea to me. / Jonas
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2008 22:24:26 UTC