- From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:58:21 +0000
- To: "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>
- CC: hsivonen@iki.fi, fielding@gbiv.com, annevk@opera.com, public-html@w3.org
T.V Raman wrote: > > Truth like beauty may be in the ear of the listener. > Your asserting that it is so --- or my asserting the contrary > does not prove anything. > > Lets just say that I continue to be sceptical about there > existing a language definition for authors. And as others have > stated, some kind of tutorial does not a language definition make. OK, let me be more specific. I suggest that the information required to "tell me how to write my document correctly" is in section 3 [1] and section 8.1 [2] of the current specification. Can you be more specific about why you believe I am wrong? [1] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#semantics [2] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#writing0 -- "Eternity's a terrible thought. I mean, where's it all going to end?" -- Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 17:00:51 UTC