Re: ISSUE-2 (privacy): Should the Geolocation API include privacy information? from Doug Turner on 2009-03-25 (public-geolocation@w3.org from March 2009)

From: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:14:30 -0700
To: Geolocation Working Group WG <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Message-Id: <428C7AFB-1B8B-442B-8182-7080293C201B@gmail.com>

Hi Matt,

This was discussed at length at the Geolocation F2F and it was voted  
on.  The Geolocaiton Position object will not include GeoPriv  
attributes.

Please explain what has changed that required you to create a new a  
new task/issue?

Regards,
Doug Turner

On Mar 25, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Geolocation Working Group Issue Tracker  
wrote:

>
> ISSUE-2 (privacy): Should the Geolocation API include privacy  
> information?
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/2
>
> Raised by: Matt Womer
> On product:
>
> This issue should be tracked in tracker.  We've had proposals from  
> the IETF GeoPriv working group to include a number of items in the  
> Coordinates object:
>
> * a time after which the location information expires
> * a boolean as to whether the location information can be  
> transmitted to 3rd parties
> * a URL pointing to further policy details
> * a human readable 'noteWell' string
>
> Each of these items has been considered in various forms and  
> discussed at the f2f and via email.
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2009 17:15:12 UTC