- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 22:17:26 +0100
- To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Cc: "'Wallmer, Martin'" <Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com>, 'Kevin Wiggen' <kwiggen@xythos.com>, www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
Lisa Dusseault wrote: > >>>Why have an architectural principle that holds us back, if >> >>it doesn't >> >>>give us something in return? >> >>It does. For instance, it allows us to define how locks and multiple >>bindings interact in a logical way. > > > This is exactly what I'm looking to understand, that I don't currently > understand. In fact, I thought that the interaction of locks and > multiple bindings was problematic. So how does this make them work > together in a logical way? Looking at the latest GULP (<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2003JanMar/0367.html>), it nicely explains how locks work without even mentioning them specifically. Maybe you could re-read it and suggest what is unclear? Regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2003 16:18:01 UTC