ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action

The proposal in ISSUE-166 is to split the spec into two documents - 
factoring out the advanced parts. We have discussed this at length many 
times and my view point has not changed. There are lots of benefits of 
having a single consistent document with the ability to cross-link 
between sections (e.g. the SPARQL definitions of the core constraint 
components require details that would otherwise have to be duplicated 
from the advanced sections). Anyone who is only interested in the Core 
language can stop reading after the first part.

PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-166 without action.

Holger

Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2016 23:12:59 UTC