On Apr 30, 2010, at 6:51 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 29.04.2010 10:31, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> ... >>> I also note that the current text got objections from both Roy and >>> me, >>> and Dan was proposing to make the citations more specific (which I >>> supported). >> >> What we're looking for now (were, actually, the deadline has now >> passed) >> is for people who object to closing the issue without prejudice, >> rather >> than people who object to the details of the text. As acknowledged in >> the CfC, we know some people would like more extensive changes, but >> we >> believe there has been more than adequate time to express other >> points >> of view in the form of a Change Proposal. >> ... > > I have opened bug <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi? > id=9627>, "be more specific in external references" -- this applies > not only to the case that Dan mentioned, but to many other sections > in the spec. (So we can discuss it separately from ISSUE-81). Thanks. Given that separate bug report, do you still object to closing ISSUE-81? Regards, Maciej
Received on Friday, 30 April 2010 21:43:17 UTC