Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples

Richard,

without going into the details of this specific issue: I am not sure you realized that there is a separate discussion going on on the very format of the profile file, see, eg, 

http://www.w3.org/mid/4C876919.10505@digitalbazaar.com

and the resulting thread. That may affect this issue, essentially turning it moot...

Ivan

On Oct 3, 2010, at 20:18 , Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> On 3 Oct 2010, at 17:31, Manu Sporny wrote:
>> If there are no objections to this proposal in 7 days, we will close
>> ISSUE-39: rdfa term mapping triples.
> 
> I object.
> 
>> The group has found that while Richard's proposal
>> does ease RDFa Profile authoring, it simultaneously raises concerns that
>> the mappings are not being modeled in a way that is acceptable by the
>> broader semantic web community.
> 
> I don't think the WG can presume an opinion of the “broader community.”
> 
> The concerns are Mark's own, not those of the broader community.
> 
> Mark's concerns about “semantical correctness” are unfounded. The proposal to use a single triple for expressing term mappings is absolutely in line with RDF Semantics -- see [1], which answers all points raised.
> 
> If Mark disagrees with this, then I would like the WG to present a rejection that is based on what's actually stated in the RDF Semantics document [2], rather than based on some imaginary RDF Semantics boogeyman.
> 
>> While the mechanism is a bit more
>> complicated, it does not risk polluting the modeling data for the
>> vocabulary term. In other words, it keeps a strict separation between
>> CURIE processing instructions and vocabulary term expression.
> 
> There was a proposal that addresses this risk, by defining the notion of a "profile graph" [3].
> 
> Best,
> Richard
> 
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Aug/0076.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/wiki/ProfileSpec
> 
> 
>> 
>> Please comment in 7 days from this post if you object to this proposal.
>> If there are no objections within 7 days, ISSUE-39 will be closed.
>> 
>> -- manu
>> 
>> -- 
>> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
>> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>> blog: WebID - Universal Login for the Web
>> http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2010/08/07/webid/2/
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Linked Data Technologist • Linked Data Research Centre
> Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI), NUI Galway, Ireland
> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
> skype:richard.cyganiak
> tel:+353-91-49-5711
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Monday, 4 October 2010 10:30:49 UTC