Re: Review of the "SKOS Reference" Last Call Working Draft [ISSUE-143]

Dear Michael

Thank you for your comments [1,ISSUE-143]:

"""
You should also say /why/ the example is consistent: Because the  
range of
skos:member is /not/ restricted. In particular, the range is /not/  
skos:Concept,
and thus allows for collections (which would otherwise not work, since
collections and concepts are disjoint).
"""


-------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the comment. An explanation has been included along the  
lines you suggest. The Working Group propose to close this issue. I  
hope this is satisfactory.

Cheers,

	Sean Bechhofer
	Alistair Miles

[ISSUE-143] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/143
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0044.html


--
Sean Bechhofer
School of Computer Science
University of Manchester
sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk
http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer

Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2008 12:08:10 UTC