- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 00:07:55 +0100
- To: Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com>
- Cc: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>, Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>, "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>, jongund@illinois.edu, jason@jasonjgw.net, wai-xtech@w3.org, w3c-wai-pf@w3.org
Bryan Garaventa, Sun, 2 Feb 2014 13:30:57 -0800: > Still, as far as I'm aware, the purpose of presentation within the > spec is to nullify a particular element within the accessibility > tree, and to leave all child nodes alone if present. The challenge is that the @src attribute doesn’t represent ”child nodes”. And further, one could argue that @src, just as @alt, is a specific img element feature, and that @srec therefore should be nullified, when img has presentation role. In my view, this makes sense, because the graphic is supposed be presentational for *all* users. Leif Halvard Silli
Received on Monday, 3 February 2014 23:08:23 UTC