Re: ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities and functional limitations)

Dan, Bruno,

can you propose concrete changes to the note that Tyler could
incorporate?

Cheers,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>






On 2007-07-06 06:54:46 -0400, Dan Schutzer wrote:
> From: Dan Schutzer <dan.schutzer@fstc.org>
> To: 'Mary Ellen Zurko' <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>,
> 	'Web Security Context WG' <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
> Cc: 'Dan Schutzer' <dan.schutzer@fstc.org>
> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 06:54:46 -0400
> Subject: RE: ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities and functional  limitations)
> X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/00a001c7bfbc$11dd2150$6500a8c0@dschutzer
> 
> o                 Disabled users (i.e. scenario 1-4); - there are many
> different types of disabilities (sight, limbs, mental,..) - I have been
> dealing with this issue wrt respect to voting machines - don't think you can
> lump them into a single category
> o                 Older people (i.e. scenario 1-4); - not sure what would
> characterize an older person as any different than younger that couldn't be
> covered by disabilities (e.g. some older people have trouble seeing small
> font, trouble hearing, less dexterity, may be losing mental agility)
> o                 Young users (children between 4- 12 years) (i.e. scenario
> 9) ; - desire for filtering here might be a relevant use case
> o                 Language issues (i.e. scenario 16); - fairly obvious
> o                 Other multicultural aspects (i.e. scenario 19); - no idea
> here
> o                 Access through a mobile device or, at least, a laptop with
> a mobile - think a saw a good mobile access scenario discussed previously
> access card (i.e. scenario 10 and 20);
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 12:20 PM
> To: Web Security Context WG
> Subject: Re: ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities and
> functional limitations)
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Please provide the proposed update. Or perhaps others can help out here.
> Unless 46 is old(er), I don't believe I have the experience or specific
> expertise to help with any of these. Looks like we've already got a proposal
> off ISSUE-6 for the mobile aspect. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Web Security Context Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org> 
> Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
> 
> 07/02/2007 07:44 AM
> 
> 
> Please respond to
> Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
> 
> 
> To
> 
> public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> 
> 
> cc
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Subject
> 
> ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities and functional
> limitations)
> 
>  
> 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities and functional
> limitations)
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/track/issues/83
> 
> Raised by: Bruno von Niman
> On product: Note: use cases etc.
> 
> Some of the 20 scenarios should be updated to include attributes typical to:
> o                 Disabled users (i.e. scenario 1-4);
> o                 Older people (i.e. scenario 1-4);
> o                 Young users (children between 4- 12 years) (i.e. scenario
> 9) ;
> o                 Language issues (i.e. scenario 16);
> o                 Other multicultural aspects (i.e. scenario 19);
> o                 Access through a mobile device or, at least, a laptop with
> a mobile 
> access card (i.e. scenario 10 and 20);
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2007 12:30:55 UTC