Re: ISSUE-4: How applicable is baseline information to content retrieved by FTP?

This takes care of ACTION-35.
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>






On 2006-11-21 16:14:28 +0000, Web Security Context Issue Tracker wrote:
> From: Web Security Context Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
> To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:14:28 +0000 (GMT)
> Subject: ISSUE-4: How applicable is baseline information to content
> 	retrieved by FTP?
> Reply-To: Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
> List-Id: <public-wsc-wg.w3.org>
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/20061121161428.8B918BDA8@w3c4.w3.org
> 
> 
> 
> ISSUE-4: How applicable is baseline information to content retrieved by FTP?
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/track/issues/4
> 
> Raised by: Stephen Farrell
> On product: Security Baseline Information
> 
> On 2006-11-21, the group agreed to keep HTTP at the center of its work. Stephen
> Farrell raised that retrieval of content by FTP might lead to new holes. The
> group is expected to review this topic again as it gets to some substance on its
> security baseline deliverable.
> 
> ACTION-32 [1] is expected to lead to a use case narrative that will be useful in
> this exercise.
> 
> 1. http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/32
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2006 16:15:52 UTC