Re: Proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0029.html from Peter F. Patel-Schneider on 2003-04-24 (www-webont-wg@w3.org from April 2003)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:58:58 -0400 (EDT)
To: connolly@w3.org
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20030424.085858.21422822.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0029.html
Date: 23 Apr 2003 09:30:06 -0500

> On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 07:59, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> [...]
> > 
> > I propose 
> > 
> > 
> > 	Because there is no standard way to go from a URI reference to an
> > 	XML Schema datatype in an XML Schema, there is no standard way to
> > 	use user-defined XML Schema in OWL.
> 
> That looks good.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> 

So should I respond?

peter

Received on Thursday, 24 April 2003 08:59:39 UTC