- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:18:56 -0500
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Nov 10, 2011, at 12:13, Ivan Herman wrote: > The problem is that both the OWL and RIF are in dormant state. What this means is that if XSD Datatypes become a standard, they will both wake up, change the references in their document, maybe handle some errors, publish an edited document, and then the groups will be closed... > > I am not sure that what you propose is editorial only in terms of the document. If it is not, I do no think it is that simple... > > David or Guus, it would be a good idea to contact officially the RIF and OWL WG chairs on this. Cc it to the Coordination Group... Done. Regards, Dave > > Thanks > > Ivan > > On Nov 10, 2011, at 18:06 , RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > >> >> RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/80 >> >> Raised by: Richard Cyganiak >> On product: RDF General >> >> The ISSUE-12 and ISSUE-71 resolutions, which are now implemented in the RDF Concepts ED [1], have removed the distinction between plain and typed literals from the RDF abstract syntax. >> >> This has a major effect on the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [2]. Parts of it are now obsolete, and the rest needs updating. >> >> RDF-WG should ask OWL-WG and RIF-WG to update the document. >> >> [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-plain-literal/ >> >> >> > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2011 18:19:33 UTC