Re: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 from Rigo Wenning on 2012-09-17 (public-tracking@w3.org from September 2012)

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:26:09 +0200
To: Mike Zaneis <mike@iab.net>
Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Ed Felten <ed@felten.com>, David Wainberg <david@networkadvertising.org>
Message-ID: <1827766.DT1PnHmrug@hegel.sophia.w3.org>

On Sunday 16 September 2012 23:23:57 Mike Zaneis wrote:
> Actually, now that the Co-Chair has decided against the need for a
> DNT: 0 option by browsers, this option is meaningless. we should
> stop acting like any W3C standard will truly offer users multiple
> useful options. What an unfortunate development. 

Can you give me a pointer to the decision of the co-chair?

Rigo

Received on Monday, 17 September 2012 06:24:35 UTC