- From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:57:44 -0800
- To: jg307@cam.ac.uk
- Cc: raman@google.com, hsivonen@iki.fi, fielding@gbiv.com, annevk@opera.com, public-html@w3.org
Truth like beauty may be in the ear of the listener. Your asserting that it is so --- or my asserting the contrary does not prove anything. Lets just say that I continue to be sceptical about there existing a language definition for authors. And as others have stated, some kind of tutorial does not a language definition make. James Graham writes: > T.V Raman wrote: > > The fact that the two parsers build the same DOM is not > > equivalent to the Web authors request of "tell me how I write my > > documents correctly". > > The answer to this latter question is given in the spec. Furthermore, in order > to disseminate the information how to author HTML 5 documents more widely, a > separate, informative, document is being written to be specifically targeted at > authors. This document will only describe things that authors need to know and > will not talk about implementation requirements. > > I really don't see where the notion that HTML 5 fails to specify how authors are > supposed to construct conforming documents has come from; it is, as far as I can > tell, simply untrue. > > -- > "Eternity's a terrible thought. I mean, where's it all going to end?" > -- Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead -- Best Regards, --raman Title: Research Scientist Email: raman@google.com WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ Google: tv+raman GTalk: raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 15:58:21 UTC