Re: Null change proposals for ISSUE-31, ISSUE-41, ISSUE-80, and ISSUE-88

On Mar 24, 2010, at 5:51 AM, Shelley Powers wrote:

> I hope you and the other co-chairs agree that these are not sufficient
> change proposals. The format is followed, but Ian vaguely references
> other change proposals without links. In fact, I'm not sure he's even
> addressed actual change proposals, or the change proposals specific to
> the issue. And it would seem that all that is needed for a good
> rationale is that he doesn't like the other proposal(s). Whatever ones
> they are.
>
> His rationale seems to be more along the vague assertions that the
> other change proposals are wrong, or bad, or he knows better. Frankly,
> they seem almost an insult to both process and the group.
>
> I'm assuming that you and the co-chairs are reviewing these and will
> apply the same stringent requirements from Ian as you've required from
> the rest of us.

The chairs plan to review these and all other recent Change Proposals  
applying the same standards as we have in the past. We will give  
specific feedback on any that we find do not meet the requirements.

Regards,
Maciej

Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 12:57:21 UTC