Re: SVG12: namespace-illformed fragments

On Dec 29, 2005, at 10:20, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Robin Berjon wrote:
>> The draft has been modified to explicitly mention all of XML 1.0, XML
>> 1.1, and namespace well-formedness. The processing of elements from
>> other namespaces has been clarified.
>
> I ain't cool with this response, the draft now requires namespace-
> wellformedness as per Namespaces in XML 1.1 in several places; this
> rules out use of XML 1.0 in most if not all cases; that's quite
> undesirable, I don't think it should do that.

The draft has been modified such that XMLNS 1.0 (and XML 1.0) is  
always an option for conforming content.

Thanks for your thorough review, please let us know shorty if you  
ain't cool with this change,

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/

Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 01:45:54 UTC