Re: major technical: no aggregates [OK?]

On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 17:28 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
[... a response that formally addresses this comment...]
> I hope you find this justification satisfactory. Please let us
> know whether you do.

So this thread is in [OK?] state.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 14:30:55 UTC