Re: twinql Retrospective (DESCRIBE refinement)

On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 09:34 -0700, Richard Newman wrote:
[...]
>    Filter functions are complex, but necessarily so. I can't produce  
> a recommendation to simplify them.
> 
>    As I write, it occurs to me that some way to say which method is  
> being (server -> client), or should be (client -> server), used for  
> DESCRIBE would be desirable -- I'd like my clients to know that  
> they're getting CBDs, or the clients might wish to ask for a certain  
> kind of description.

OK, we'll think about that a bit and get back to you.

> [1] <http://www.holygoat.co.uk/projects/twinql/>
> [2] <http://wilbur-rdf.sourceforge.net/>
> [3] <http://www.holygoat.co.uk/blog/entry/2005-07-12-3>
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2005 23:00:48 UTC