- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:51:43 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
* Norman Walsh wrote: >This link does not conform to XLink: > > <someElement xlink:type="foobar">foo</someElement> > >Nor does this one: > > <someElement xlink:show="foobar">bar</someElement> > >Those elements don't conform to 3.2 and therefore per my earlier >suggestion: > > Would the following rewording of point 3 of Section > 3.3 make things clearer? > > 3. it applies XLink semantics only to those elments which satisfy > the markup conformance criteria outlined in [3.2 Markup Confromance]. > >those elements would not have XLink semantics. Well, you said that in XLink 1.0 error handling is implementation- defined and that the WG rejects my request to define error-handling in XLink 1.1; the text above does define error handling, so I'm not really sure what the Working Group's response might be here. Could you give an example of markup that involves XLink, does not conform to XLink 1.1, but does not trigger the error handling re- quirements you propose? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 16:21:07 UTC