- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 13:41:53 +0100
- To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
On 2012-05-13, at 15:59, Richard Cyganiak wrote: … > PROPOSAL: The abstract syntax for working with multiple graphs in RDF consists of a default graph and zero or more pairs of IRI and graph. This resolves ISSUE-5 (“no”), ISSUE-22 (“yes”), ISSUE-28 (“no”), ISSUE-29 (“yes”), ISSUE-30 (“they are isomorphic”), ISSUE-33 (“no”). I am in favour of this. Ivan, sadly Sandro's document is too complex for me to have digested the implications of it yet (entirely my fault), but I would object to us adopting it on that basis. The concepts and terms it introduces may be analogous to things in common usage, but that's hard to determine quickly. - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO Garlik, a part of Experian 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 12:42:38 UTC