Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation

> > From: Roger Menday <roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com> 
> > To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, 
> > Cc: Linked Data Platform Working Group <public-ldp-wg@w3.org> 
> > Date: 04/30/2013 01:26 PM 
> > Subject: Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete 
> > description of members is  included in LDPC representation 
> > 
> > My preference would be for option D (I was convinced by Pierre-
> > Antoine's argumentation a few weeks ago). 
> > 
> > But, I don't see why the language has to be so container specific. 
> > For me this is one of those features where LDP is helping with 
> > reading of any kind of Linked Data. 
> > 
> > regards, 
> > Roger 
> 
> What else would you propose?

Well, for option D, maybe it could be re-phrased something like: 

"Add a repeatable HTTP Header, such as X-Cacheable-for, which when set to a URI referenced in the description document means that a complete description of that resource has been fully inlined (to the best knowledge of the server). "

Roger



______________________________________________________________________
                                        
 Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited
 Hayes Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE
 Registered No. 4153469
 
 This e-mail and any attachments are for the sole use of addressee(s) and
 may contain information which is privileged and confidential. Unauthorised
 use or copying for disclosure is strictly prohibited. The fact that this
 e-mail has been scanned by Trendmicro Interscan does not guarantee that 
 it has not been intercepted or amended nor that it is virus-free.