RE: SKOS and OWL2

Hi Antoine,

It seems we share the same concerns on the use of OWL/OWL 2 constructs with
SKOS (esp. nature of properties and disjointness). On the other hand,
annotation property hierarchies and role-chains, available in OWL 2, can
offer a direct answer to some of the conditions. When you are able, you can
have a look at our draft too. Once we get some more feedback and
tests(hopefully) we could discuss a common proposal. 
In the meantime I am including the URLs of your mail as well as Peter's at
our wiki page.

Best Regards,
Georgia

-----Original Message-----
From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Antoine Isaac
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 11:05 PM
To: Georgia Solomou
Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org; Dimitrios Koutsomitropoulos
Subject: Re: SKOS and OWL2

Hi Georgia,

Good initiative! I have started a similar effort a while ago [2], but the WG
had other priorities at the time.
I have no time to look at your work right the coming days, but I'll be very
interested to see how it compares with what I tried!
Maybe we could come with some common contribution. If both of us propose a
same axiom, then it's certainly valid...

Cheers,

Antoine

[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Mar/0043.html

> Hello,
> 
>  
> 
> Me and my colleagues are working on expressing in OWL 2 some semantic 
> conditions described in the SKOS Reference document. In particular, we 
> work on  those semantic conditions that are not yet formally expressed 
> in the current SKOS Schema.  We provide a draft of this work at [1].
> Your comments and remarks are welcome.
> 
>  
> 
> Kind Regards,
> 
> Georgia Solomou
> 
>  
> 
> [1] http://apollo.hpclab.ceid.upatras.gr:8001/hpclabwiki/Skos2Owl2


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2009 13:25:13 UTC