ISSUE-174: potential conflict between Link: and <link> semantics

link-semantic-conflict

potential conflict between Link: and <link> semantics

State:
CLOSED
Product:
HTML 5 spec
Raised by:
Julian Reschke
Opened on:
2011-08-30
Description:
The decision on ISSUE-27 has resulted in a state where the semantics of link relations may depend on where they appear in (Link: HTTP header vs HTML content).

Minimally, the spec should clarify that there's potential for conflict, and explain that the semantics of link relations appearing in the HTTP Link header field are defined by RFC 5988 and the IANA link relations registry, not the Microformats Wiki.

See <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12490>.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-01-26: issue progress (from glenn@skynav.com on 2012-02-02)
  2. RE: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2012-01-26: issue progress (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2012-02-02)
  3. Revert Request [was RE: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2012-01-26: issue progress] (from john@foliot.ca on 2012-02-01)
  4. {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2012-01-26: issue progress (from mjs@apple.com on 2012-02-01)
  5. {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2011-12-15: issue progress, editor's drafts, speech xg (from eoconnor@apple.com on 2011-12-15)
  6. {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2011-12-15: issue progress, editor's drafts, speech xg (from mjs@apple.com on 2011-12-14)
  7. RE: CfC: Close ISSUE-174: link-semantic-conflict by Amicable Resolution (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2011-12-08)
  8. RE: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2011-12-08: actions, issues and task force reports (from adrianba@microsoft.com on 2011-12-08)
  9. {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2011-12-08: actions, issues and task force reports (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2011-12-07)
  10. {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2011-12-01: actions and issues (from eoconnor@apple.com on 2011-12-01)
  11. {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2011-12-01: actions and issues (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2011-11-29)
  12. CfC: Close ISSUE-174: link-semantic-conflict by Amicable Resolution (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2011-11-29)
  13. {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2011-11-17: action, issue, and task force updates (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2011-11-17)
  14. {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2011-11-17: action, issue, and task force updates (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2011-11-16)
  15. RE: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2010-10-27: issue updates, task force reports (from adrianba@microsoft.com on 2011-10-27)
  16. {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2010-10-27: issue updates, task force reports (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2011-10-26)
  17. ISSUE-174 link-semantic-conflict: Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2011-10-25)
  18. {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2010-10-20: issue updates (from eoconnor@apple.com on 2011-10-20)
  19. {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2010-10-20: issue updates (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2011-10-19)
  20. Change Proposal for ISSUE-174, was: ISSUE-174 link-semantic-conflict: Chairs Solicit Proposals (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2011-10-16)
  21. {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2010-10-13: issue updates, task force reports (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2011-10-13)
  22. RE: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2010-10-13: issue updates, task force reports (from Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com on 2011-10-13)
  23. {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2010-10-13: issue updates, task force reports (from mjs@apple.com on 2011-10-12)
  24. {minutes} HTML WG telcon 2011-09-22 (from mike@w3.org on 2011-09-23)
  25. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2011-09-22 ¿¿¿ anyone willing to scribe ??? (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2011-09-20)
  26. ISSUE-174 link-semantic-conflict: Chairs Solicit Proposals (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2011-09-20)
  27. HTML WG telecon 2011-09-01: Issue progress, Task Force reports (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2011-08-31)
  28. HTML-ISSUE-174 (link-semantic-conflict): potential conflict between Link: and <link> semantics [HTML 5 spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-08-30)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Changelog:

Created issue 'potential conflict between Link: and <link> semantics' nickname link-semantic-conflict owned by Julian Reschke on product HTML 5 spec, description 'The decision on ISSUE-27 has resulted in a state where the semantics of link relations may depend on where they appear in (Link: HTTP header vs HTML content).

Minimally, the spec should clarify that there's potential for conflict, and explain that the semantics of link relations appearing in the HTTP Link header field are defined by RFC 5988 and the IANA link relations registry, not the Microformats Wiki.

See <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12490>.' non-public

Julian Reschke, 30 Aug 2011, 08:29:40

Status changed to 'open'

Sam Ruby, 26 Oct 2011, 01:21:37

Status changed to 'pending review'

Philippe Le Hégaret, 17 Jan 2012, 18:52:38

Status changed to 'open'

Philippe Le Hégaret, 17 Jan 2012, 21:10:45

Status changed to 'closed'

Sam Ruby, 6 Feb 2012, 15:27:06


Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Chairs, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $