ISSUE-136: would the <small> element be better handled in CSS?

remove-small

would the <small> element be better handled in CSS?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
HTML 5 spec
Raised by:
Sam Ruby
Opened on:
2010-10-21
Description:
This issue was raised on behalf of Cynthia Shelly. See the associated bug for details:

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10581
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. RE: {minutes} HTML WG Telecon 2010-01-20: status of actions, calls; task force reports (from adrianba@microsoft.com on 2011-01-20)
  2. {agenda} HTML WG Telecon 2010-01-20: status of actions, calls; task force reports (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2011-01-18)
  3. Re: ISSUE-136 (remove-small): Chairs Solicit Proposals (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2011-01-17)
  4. {agenda} HTML WG Telecon 2010-12-16: status of actions, calls, new decisions, task force reports (from mjs@apple.com on 2011-01-12)
  5. {minutes} HTML WG Telecon 2011-01-06: status of actions, calls, deadlines, task force reports (from plh@w3.org on 2011-01-11)
  6. HTML WG Telecon 2010-12-16: status of actions, calls; task force reports (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2011-01-05)
  7. RE: {minutes} HTML WG Telecon 2010-12-02: status, task force reports, deadlines and publications, meeting schedule (from adrianba@microsoft.com on 2010-12-02)
  8. {agenda} HTML WG Telecon 2010-12-02: status, task force reports, deadlines and publications, meeting schedule (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2010-12-01)
  9. ISSUE-136 (remove-small): Chairs Solicit Proposals (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-11-30)
  10. {minutes} HTML WG F2F minutes, Lyon, France, Nov 4-5 Part 1 (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-11-09)
  11. RE: {minutes} HTML WG Telecon 2010-10-28: status of actions, calls, issues, heartbeat drafts, TPAC, Task Force reports (from adrianba@microsoft.com on 2010-10-28)
  12. {agenda} HTML WG Telecon 2010-10-28: status of actions, calls, issues, heartbeat drafts, TPAC, Task Force reports (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-10-28)
  13. ISSUE-136 (remove-small): would the <small> element be better handled in CSS? [HTML 5 spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-10-21)

Related notes:

Closed without prejudice: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0158.html

Sam Ruby, 17 Jan 2011, 22:49:15

Changelog:

Created issue 'would the <small> element be better handled in CSS?' nickname remove-small owned by Sam Ruby on product HTML 5 spec, description 'This issue was raised on behalf of Cynthia Shelly. See the associated bug for details:

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10581' non-public

Sam Ruby, 21 Oct 2010, 18:28:55

Status changed to 'closed'

Sam Ruby, 17 Jan 2011, 22:49:15


Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Chairs, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $