ISSUE-136: would the <small> element be better handled in CSS?
remove-small
would the <small> element be better handled in CSS?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- HTML 5 spec
- Raised by:
- Sam Ruby
- Opened on:
- 2010-10-21
- Description:
- This issue was raised on behalf of Cynthia Shelly. See the associated bug for details:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10581 - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- RE: {minutes} HTML WG Telecon 2010-01-20: status of actions, calls; task force reports (from adrianba@microsoft.com on 2011-01-20)
- {agenda} HTML WG Telecon 2010-01-20: status of actions, calls; task force reports (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2011-01-18)
- Re: ISSUE-136 (remove-small): Chairs Solicit Proposals (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2011-01-17)
- {agenda} HTML WG Telecon 2010-12-16: status of actions, calls, new decisions, task force reports (from mjs@apple.com on 2011-01-12)
- {minutes} HTML WG Telecon 2011-01-06: status of actions, calls, deadlines, task force reports (from plh@w3.org on 2011-01-11)
- HTML WG Telecon 2010-12-16: status of actions, calls; task force reports (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2011-01-05)
- RE: {minutes} HTML WG Telecon 2010-12-02: status, task force reports, deadlines and publications, meeting schedule (from adrianba@microsoft.com on 2010-12-02)
- {agenda} HTML WG Telecon 2010-12-02: status, task force reports, deadlines and publications, meeting schedule (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2010-12-01)
- ISSUE-136 (remove-small): Chairs Solicit Proposals (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-11-30)
- {minutes} HTML WG F2F minutes, Lyon, France, Nov 4-5 Part 1 (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-11-09)
- RE: {minutes} HTML WG Telecon 2010-10-28: status of actions, calls, issues, heartbeat drafts, TPAC, Task Force reports (from adrianba@microsoft.com on 2010-10-28)
- {agenda} HTML WG Telecon 2010-10-28: status of actions, calls, issues, heartbeat drafts, TPAC, Task Force reports (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-10-28)
- ISSUE-136 (remove-small): would the <small> element be better handled in CSS? [HTML 5 spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-10-21)
Related notes:
Closed without prejudice: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0158.html
Sam Ruby, 17 Jan 2011, 22:49:15Display change log