ACTION-29
Follow up on the idea of a free-software-compatible license for a note on HTML authoring
- State:
- open
- Person:
- Philippe Le Hégaret
- Due on:
- 2009-11-05
- Created on:
- 2007-11-29
- Related emails:
- Re: HTML Working Group Decision Policy - for discussion (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-10-08)
- Re: free-software-compatible license for HTML5 (ACTION-29) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-09-30)
- free-software-compatible license for HTML5 (ACTION-29) (from plh@w3.org on 2009-09-30)
- [Minutes] HTML Weekly Teleconference 05 February 2009 (from karl+w3c@la-grange.net on 2009-02-05)
- Re: Discussions with plh [was: Moving Forward] (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-02-03)
- Re: Discussions with plh [was: Moving Forward] (from lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au on 2009-02-03)
- Re: Discussions with plh (License) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-02-02)
- Re: Discussions with plh (License) (from connolly@w3.org on 2009-02-02)
- {minutes} HTML WG issue-tracking telcon 2008-06-19 (from mike@w3.org on 2008-06-25)
- License discussions in progress at W3M (from chris@w3.org on 2008-05-14)
- {minutes} 2008-04-03 HTML WG telcon (from mike@w3.org on 2008-04-04)
- {minutes} HTML WG teleconference 2008-01-24 (from mike@w3.org on 2008-01-25)
Related notes:
2007-11-29 16:04:16: I forwarded it internally. Mike, feel free to re-assign this action to you. [Dan Connolly]
2007-11-29 16:05:17: oh... it= Anne's msg. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2007OctDec/0006.html [Dan Connolly]
2007-11-29 16:05:43: original suggestion was:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Nov/0292.html
[Dan Connolly]
2007-12-06 05:17:55: the internal discussion is underway, but it looks like it will take a while. Anybody who needs this before end of Jan will please say so. [Dan Connolly]
2008-07-10 14:23:35: haven't heard anything since the 14 May update; I'm pinging people internally. [Dan Connolly]
2008-07-17 15:30:15: internal discussion shows progress, but it's slow. [Dan Connolly]
2008-08-14 15:35:40: internal discussion continues... it seems likely that we'll explicitly license exerpts but not modifications.
The IETF seems to be working on something similar. http://trustee.ietf.org/docs/IETF_Trust_Legal_Permission_for_IETF_Docs_8-05-08.txt [Dan Connolly]
2008-09-11 16:10:11: Henri Sivonen's reply to Chris Lilley explains his interest in a free software license: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2008Jun/0147.html [Shawn Medero]
2008-10-10 14:16:13: internal deadline pushed back [Dan Connolly]
2008-11-13 17:41:12: the internal discussion has been pushed back to: due 2008-12-10
[Dan Connolly]
2008-12-16 22:03:57: I'm pinging internally... [Dan Connolly]
2008-12-16 22:51:13: internal discussion continues... [Dan Connolly]
2009-01-14 17:31:15: working on this with Rigo, Ian, PLH, Mike, and others... Ian suggest one more week should yield some results. [Dan Connolly]
2009-02-02 22:00:49: Note Sam's report on discussion with W3C management
http://www.w3.org/mid/49876B47.8000803@intertwingly.net
[Dan Connolly]
2009-02-02 22:02:53: overtaken by Sam's discussion with PLH? [Dan Connolly]
2009-02-05 17:14:04: reassigned to Sam Ruby at 2009-02-05 call [Gregory Rosmaita]
2009-02-17 17:17:21: note use case decision meanwhile http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Feb/0321.html [Dan Connolly]
2009-09-30 09:36:31: We agreed to postpone this to November 5th. Philippe will send a status update to the group. [Maciej Stachowiak]
2009-10-07 21:23:18: Email to PSIG sent:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-psig/2009OctDec/0000.html [Philippe Le Hégaret]
Display change log.